Evaluating co-production and measuring impact
Measuring What Matters is a simple and practical tool for anyone undertaking evaluation, to help them ask the right questions, of the right people, in the right way. There is a huge amount of guidance available to organisations regarding evaluation, but the landscape can be hard to navigate. It is not always easy to separate the good advice from the bad, to know which advice is relevant and which isn’t, and to know exactly how you should gather […]
PUTTING PEOPLE AT THE HEART OF COMMUNITY CARE The PERCCI (pronounced ‘Percy’) allows care providers and the people they support to understand the quality of care and how it is being experienced. It is based on rigorous University research and evidence, and evaluates three established principles of person-centred care: understanding the person involving people in decisions about their care building positive care relationships The tool asks 12 simple questions – designed in full partnership with people with experience of using care services. […]
john Burgoyne writes on the Centre for Public Impact website. Read the full article here. We propose a way of thinking that acknowledges that: Collecting data through measurement is useful, as it allows us to better understand problems we face and our progress The problems we face are complex in nature, however, so holding people accountable to metrics beyond their control is not helpful Measurement should not be used for top-down control, but rather to learn […]
The Co-production and Involvement Audit is a simple self-assessment tool which helps organisations assess how effective they are at successfully adopting co-productive ways of working. It consists of fifteen action statements, organised in accordance with the ‘five core principles of co-production’ each of which is given a score. It provides a high-level snapshot of how you are doing, alongside an understanding of what is working, and what needs to be done to keep improving. The […]
Impact and outcomes reporting Supporting intermediary organisations Iriss. Published July 2018. “Iriss was involved in delivering workshops, alongside Corra Foundation, that helped explore with intermediary support organisations their approaches to expressing the impact and outcomes of their work. The organisations taking part all received core funding through the Scottish Government’s CYPFEIF and ALEC Fund (Children, Young People and Families Early Intervention Fund and Adult Learning and Empowering Communities Fund), which Corra Foundation administers…” https://www.iriss.org.uk/resources/reports/impact-and-outcomes-reporting
Evaluation Support Scotland Evaluation Support Scotland (ESS) works with third sector organisations and funders so that they can measure and report on their impact. Our aim is to make evaluation valuable, relevant and proportionate. Our website gives access to evaluation tools and support. We explain our work with funders to make reporting more useful. And we share learning about the difference the third sector makes. The website provides many tools – we have listed several below the […]
This is an entry that complements the Measuring What Matters toolkit which you can find here: https://info.copronet.wales/measuring-what-matters/ Measuring What Matters online tool result: “no result” Code ??? Explanation The answers you have selected don’t match any of our results. This may be because there is no perfect match for your needs. Consider: If the activity you selected to evaluate was the correct one? Was it too broad, or too specific? If you […]
This is an entry that complements the Measuring What Matters toolkit which you can find here: https://info.copronet.wales/measuring-what-matters/ Measuring What Matters online tool result: code CHJ Technical description You want to adopt quantitative and consultative approach, to an economic evaluation, and want to commit time and resources to gathering rich and detailed evidence. Glossary Participatory approaches: Involve the stakeholders of a programme or policy in the evaluation process. (Source: Better Evaluation) Co-productive approaches: Share power […]
This is an entry that complements the Measuring What Matters toolkit which you can find here: https://info.copronet.wales/measuring-what-matters/ Measuring What Matters online tool result: code EGI Technical description You want to adopt an observational or experimental approach, to an outcome or impact evaluation, that can be delivered relatively quickly and easily. Glossary Participatory approaches: Involve the stakeholders of a programme or policy in the evaluation process. (Source: Better Evaluation) Co-productive approaches: Share power and responsibility […]
This is an entry that complements the Measuring What Matters toolkit which you can find here: https://info.copronet.wales/measuring-what-matters/ Measuring What Matters online tool result: code EFJ Technical description You want to adopt an observational or experimental approach, to a formative or process evaluation, and want to commit time and resources to gathering rich and detailed evidence. Glossary Participatory approaches: Involve the stakeholders of a programme or policy in the evaluation process. (Source: Better Evaluation) […]
This is an entry that complements the Measuring What Matters toolkit which you can find here: https://info.copronet.wales/measuring-what-matters/ Measuring What Matters online tool result: code EFI Technical description You want to adopt an observational or experimental approach, to a formative or process evaluation, that can be delivered relatively quickly and easily. Glossary Participatory approaches: Involve the stakeholders of a programme or policy in the evaluation process. (Source: Better Evaluation) Co-productive approaches: Share power and responsibility […]